asiakillo.blogg.se

1. #WHERE TO BUY MICROSOFT OFFICE 2013 PROFESSIONAL INSTALL#
2. #WHERE TO BUY MICROSOFT OFFICE 2013 PROFESSIONAL FULL#
3. #WHERE TO BUY MICROSOFT OFFICE 2013 PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE#

You can activate directly with the product key, and Office uses your domain info instead of the MS account.

#WHERE TO BUY MICROSOFT OFFICE 2013 PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE#

My situation: getting in machines with OEM office product key (just like with older versions), software preinstalled. You can get OEM Office 2013 H & B installed and activated without a MS account. MS could absolutely clean up their licensing but there will always be instances like this. These guys did their due diligence by having the purchase prepared by a professional geek, then had an accountant overrule that decision without discussion.

You guys will not resolve this because you are both right.

That's the SMB employees not doing their due diligence. They're supposed to be specialists in procuring the right thing for the best price. Companies have a purchasing department for the purpose of streamlining processes and making sure that the right thing is purchased for the right job. It's easy to point the finger at the big software giant with confusing licensing terms, but the "little guy SMB" is big enough to have a purchasing department for crying out loud. I agree with the "buy 100 of those cards, they have no clue" part, but again this isn't Microsoft's problem. It's not the WRONG version, it's the WRONG version for EChapman930's specifications. The version that will save more time and more money will cost more. The version with less features is cheaper, that makes perfect sense. It sounds like EChapman930 did that but his purchasing department doesn't understand the difference between the ranger and a real work truck. At some point the customer has to take responsibility for setting specifications for it's needs and choose what's right for them. Sure it's "tempting" to get the cheaper truck, but it doesn't offer the features you want/need to work. That's like asking why a super duty ford truck costs more than a ford ranger. but we all know that if you walk into a Staples or Best Buy and buy 100 of those cards, they have no clue what you are doing or why or what you should be doing, etc. I think MS is also relying on their vendors (insight/CDW/etc) to help companies purchase the correct thing.

#WHERE TO BUY MICROSOFT OFFICE 2013 PROFESSIONAL INSTALL#

For example, the FPK's don't indicate they are tied to a single machine until after you purchase/download and during the install read the EULA, you read the whole thing every time, right? yeah I don't either. Personally i think they do this to entice very small businesses and home users to 'be legal.' But they don't do enough to educate SMB's of the licensing requirements and advantages of doing things correctly.

This *IS* the case with office 2013 professional, where the MOL version is cheaper than the retail box.

What I don't understand is why Microsoft "tempts" people into doing this by making one version (in this case the WRONG version) cheaper? The volume license should be the same price or cheaper than this other version. It is clear that what he purchased was not the best solution for his environment for the reasons you listed and the reasons the OP listed.

#WHERE TO BUY MICROSOFT OFFICE 2013 PROFESSIONAL FULL#

With OEM and Full Box you have to manually install each one. With a VL, you're always using the same key and you are allowed to use images to deploy Office. They might be, but you are still limited in the number of machines you can install that copy on, and would have to manually deal with the CD Keys. Dash, CDW is selling individual licenses for Home and Business and I confirmed that it is a few bucks more than the keycard version he bought.